Sensory Stories # 82: Do you prefer face-to-face or digital engagements?

Posted: 26 April, 2023

By: Annemarie Lombard

#82

In this video, will take a Sensory Intelligence™ approach to looking at the difference between engaging face-to-face versus digitally or online.

We use many of our senses when we are in a real-life situation engaging with people face-to-face, so there is a lot of sensory stimulation. On the other hand, digital engagement is virtual and takes place through a screen, thus we mostly make use of our visual and auditory senses. Most people prefer one mode of engagement over the other, but why is that?

Watch the video to learn more about what makes sensory seekers different from sensory avoiders, and how this unique sensory wiring contributes to our default preferences. We are all different and our sensory needs provide a baseline for us in subconsciously choosing activities and environments that suit us best.

#sensoryintelligence #sensoryprocessing #sensory #hybrid #online #onlineshopping #neuroscience

👉 Check out our website for more information and remember to subscribe.

👉 Get a FREE, quick and easy introduction to assessing your sensory style by taking our Sensory Quiz™

👉 If you want to know how your sensory thresholds work, do our online Sensory Matrix™ and learn new things about yourself.

👉 Sensory Intelligence® will help you to understand yourself and others better, make different choices and adapt your life to be healthy, happy and productive.

👩🏼‍🎓 Annemarie has a PhD in Occupational therapy, Health Sciences and continues to be fascinated by sensory processing and the impact it has on our lives. She works with a dynamic team and a group of licensed users of the Sensory Intelligence® tools. She has also written a book, “Sensory intelligence, why it matters more than IQ and EQ”, which you can buy here.

Who has benefited

24054
Sensory Quiz™
completed
13832
Sensory Matrix™
completed
9942
Senses on Call™
completed
235
Senses@Work™
completed
20694
Social media
fans
16958
Sensory Intelligence®
subscribers
526
Practitioners
trained